Print the Handbook
Academic Appeals
- Grades/marks
- Progression
- Degree classification
- Degree award
Academic Misconduct
Attendance and Engagement
- Monitoring your attendance/engagement on your programme and;
- Reporting to the Home Office where you suspend or withdraw from your studies, complete them early, fail to register or are repeatedly absent to the point of being excluded from studies.
- Ensure you have a correct and valid visa for studying at the University of Edinburgh, which, if a Tier 4 visa, requires that it is a visa sponsored by the University of Edinburgh;
- Attend all of your University classes, lectures, tutorials, etc., where required. This includes participating in the requirements of your course including submitting assignments, attending meetings with tutors and attending examinations. If you cannot attend due to illness, for example, you must inform your School. This includes attending Tier 4 Census sessions when required throughout the academic session.
Board of Examiners
Key Locations
Special Circumstances
- Please refer to the Special Circumstances Policy for full guidance: http://www.ed.ac.uk/files/atoms/files/special_circumstances_0.pdf
Student Support
- Absences, Interruption of Study applications and Withdrawal
- University procedures
- Special Circumstances applications
- Information on University of Edinburgh Services
- Degree Transfer and Course Changes
The Student Contract
Timetabling
Digital Media and Culture
MSc by Research in Digital Media and Culture
Programme Handbook
Session: 2017/18
[Updated 14 September 2017. For 2016-17 Handbook see archive.]
Obsolete Soviet early warning radar system, Ukraine.
About this Handbook
This handbook presents information about the MSc by Research in Digital Media and Culture and is intended to provide students with basic information on the programme content, aims and objectives, teaching and assessment, support and other issues. It indicates what is expected of you, and will help you to make the most of your time on the Programme. It should be read carefully and frequently, and used in conjunction with other material provided by the University and the School (Edinburgh College of Art), especially the
- Code of Practice for Supervisors and Research Students
- Students Association Postgrad Handbook (also known as the "EUSA Postgrad Guide")
Note: This handbook is published by the Edinburgh College of Art to give information to candidates about the MSc/Diploma programme. This programme handbook does not supersede the University regulations, and the formal requirements for the programme are as set out in the
The Degree Programme Table (DPT) entry for this programme shows its structure and options. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information in this handbook is correct at the start of the session. However, details are subject to change during the course of the year, and will then be notified to students as appropriate.
Programme Director
Professor Richard Coyne
Edinburgh School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture (ESALA)Edinburgh College of Art Office: Lang Gallery (room 3.55) 20 Chambers Street Edinburgh EH1 1JZ, UK Phone: +44(0)131 650 2332
- Email: Richard.Coyne@ed.ac.uk
- Web: http://www.eca.ed.ac.uk/architecture-landscape-architecture/richard-coyne
- Personal: http://richardcoyne.com/richard-coyne
- Blog: http://richardcoyne.com
Content: Digital Media and Culture
Courses and studying
The programme in Digital Media and Culture is a research based degree with some coursework that allows students flexibility in following their own interests. The degree is taken in one year full time, or two years part time.Semester 1
Researching Cultures (ARCH11088) This course will introduce students to the materials and expertise required to conduct postgraduate research. It will introduce Edinburgh's extensive range of research resources (print and electronic) as well as archives, special collections and the academic context of the institution (such seminar series, public lectures, postgraduate conferences and journals). It will familiarise the students with skills necessary to embark on their postgraduate research, recognize the research methodologies that these resources serve so they can lead to effective research strategies. The course offers a series of workshops and seminars some focused on specific research skills, others broad in scope to encourage explorations across disciplines, methodologies, and modes of enquiry. The course will provide students with a general introduction to postgraduate research and will give them the scope and opportunity to produce solid preliminary research on topics that they choose.or
Postgraduate Research Methods (CACE11001)
This course provides a general introduction to postgraduate research, its methodologies, its challenges and its organisation, including in creative practice. You will be introduced to a range of research tools and will be equipped to plan and organise your research, as well as to communicate your findings. The course involves participants from several disciplines, including PhD students.
Media and Culture (ARCH11002) This is an introduction to the issues that surround the emergence of digital design. Seminar and lecture sessions cover topics that enable students to discuss the impact of digital technology from its immediate practical application to the long term redefinition of the creative professions. Research Reading Course A (Arch11027) This is a directed reading course for examining theoretical and philosophical issues pertaining to media, culture, computing, visual and interaction design, sound design, music, film, visuality or other areas agreed between the student and a supervisor. Students may be required to participate in seminars. Research Reading Course A may be substituted with an Option Course from list A.Semester 2
Digital Media and Culture Research Report (Arch11029) This is a supervised programme of self-directed research examining theoretical and philosophical issues pertaining to digital media and culture. Students may be required to participate in seminars. Digital Media and Culture Research Report may be substituted with an Option Course from list B. Research Review (Arch11030) This is a supervised programme of self-directed research with particular emphasis on surveying contemporary developments in digital media. Students may be required to participate in seminars. Research Review may be substituted with 2 Option Courses from list B. Research Reading Course B (Arch11028) This is a directed reading course for examining theoretical and philosophical issues pertaining to media, culture, computing, visual and interaction design, sound design, music, film, visuality or other areas agreed between the student and a supervisor. Students may be required to participate in seminars. Final Project: Design Media and Culture Dissertation (Arch11031) This is a major project involving research into digital media and culture. Work can commence in semester 2, though approval to proceed will depend on the outcome of the Examination Board meeting at the end of semester 2. Work should continue to the August submission date. Option courses list A (also see Handbook for MSc in Design and Digital Media)- 3D and Animated Design ARCH11248
- Introduction to Digital Design ARCH11192
- Interactive Visual Design ARCH11251
- Sound Design Media
- Sonic Structures
- Film Theory and Criticism
- Dynamic Web Design
- The Digital Marketplace
- Digital Media Studio Project
- Interactive Sound Environments
- Sound and Fixed Media
- Film Theory and Criticism (Note that this course is worth 40 credits and runs over two semesters.)
Degree Programme Tables (DPT)
Organisation of Teaching
Submissions
Guidelines for submissions
(a) The fully “official” version of any submission is by copying the file(s) or a digital version of the written text (for essays etc.) to the online SubSys submissions system. This must always be submitted by the due date, and will be treated as the real submission for any formal purposes. Login to https://subsys.ace.ed.ac.uk/subsys/. You will see a link for each submission appropriate to the courses you are registered on. Please drop in here exactly the material required for the submission. These folders will lock after the deadline. Name your files so that it is clear which part of the submission each file constitutes. (b) Accompanying each official submission, we require a completed online Declaration of Own Work form. (c) Where asked, you should also upload your submissions to infrar.ed. It is a requirement that you tag each file uploaded with the appropriate metadata. Note that the infrar.ed submission is NOT the official submission, so do make sure you have also submitted to the drop-box. Websites- Place the site in your 'playground' directory (location to follow). There is a subfolder for each website submission. Ensure that your site works in this location. The best way to use these is actually to build your site in this location from the start. So that we always know exactly how to view it, your website for the submission should appear online using exactly the URL derived from the name of the folder, e.g.: .../your_folder/submissions/idm1/. This will only work if you have an index.html file directly in that folder (not in another folder inside that one), so please construct your site this way.
- You must still also copy the content of this folder into the SubSys. This ensures that nothing has changed on the site between the submission deadline and marking, whilst also ensuring that a working version remains online.
Submission Dates
For all submission dates, please see the Programme Calendar. Note: This page mirrors the submission requirements for the MSc in Design and Digital Media.Marking scheme
- A1 90-100 An excellent performance, satisfactory for a distinction.
- A2 80-89 An excellent performance, satisfactory for a distinction.
- A3 70-79 An excellent performance, satisfactory for a distinction.
- B 60-69 A very good performance
- C 50-59 A good performance, satisfactory for a masters degree.
- D 40-49 A satisfactory performance for the diploma, but inadequate for a masters degree.
- E 30-39 Marginal fail *
- F 20-29 Clear fail *
- G 10-19 Bad fail *
- H 0-9 Bad fail *
A1 (90+) Excellent
Requirements are as for A2, but with all or almost all aspects of the work being of exemplary standard. Normal expectations will have been substantially exceeded and there will be clear evidence of originality. Work at this level may be considered to be publishable in a scholarly or academic conference, or similar context.A2 (80-89) Excellent
Requirements are as for A3, with the addition that most aspects of the work will be of exemplary quality, normal expectations of the brief or task having been clearly exceeded. There may be evidence of originality in thought, conception or execution.A3 (70-79) Excellent
Design work
Requirements are as for a B, with the addition that the design is of excellent quality, in terms of concept, resolution and level of integration. It is well justified and there are no obvious gaps in the presentation, whatever means are used. The approach taken may entail some risk but the work has been successful in terms made clear in its presentation. In the case of team work there may be evidence of team leadership. The work may be excellent in its totality, or there may be some aspect of the work that is exemplary. This aspect should be well communicated and be important in terms of the project brief. Where there is evidence that the student has exceeded the time and effort normally required for the project then this time and effort is evident in the quality of the work.Written work
The Structure will demonstrate a close, critical engagement with the question and demonstrate a strong grasp of its wider implications. The piece of work will have a clear argument and factual material will be used in an analytical, rather than descriptive way, to further that argument. The Language and Expression will be appropriate to the task and demonstrate a clear understanding of the appropriate scholarly apparatus. It will aid the development of the argument through its fluency and clear evidence of independent thought. A piece of work at this level will have a strong base in a Range of Knowledge that is both broad and deep. It will demonstrate a clear understanding of the complexity of the subject, an ability to argue at both the general and particular level and to evaluate information and make discriminating use of it. In general, the work will meet the requirements of the assignment brief in a way that is exemplary through its thoroughness and/or it may exceed the expectations of the brief in certain respects. The work may be excellent in its totality, or there may be some aspect of the work that is exemplary. The approach taken and the argument followed may entail some risk but this has been successful in terms made clear in the work. Where the work entails the collection and collation of data, this will be handled with appropriate rigour and be very well integrated into the argumentation. In the case of team work, there may be evidence of team leadership. Where there is evidence that the student has exceeded the time and effort normally required for the task, this will be evident in the quality of the work.B (60-69) Very Good
Design work
The project meets the requirements of the project brief or challenges them in a way that is creative and well argued. The design is of high quality with good justification for the decisions made. Where a student is given scope for defining the problem tackled, then the problem presents a high degree of challenge appropriate to the level of the course. The presentation is complete, though there may be gaps that could be resolved with minor modification. There is evidence of consistency of application in developing the design from the early stages of the design. Where group work is involved then there is evidence of full engagement in the work of the team. Where the project emphasises the production of a complete design then the work shows an ability to resolve the design at an appropriate level.Written work
The Structure will demonstrate a serious attempt at critical engagement with the question and demonstrate an appreciation of its wider implications. The piece of work will have a clear argument and will employ relevant factual material. This may be used mainly analytically, although with less critical engagement than A-grade work. The Language and Expression will be accurate and show an understanding of the appropriate scholarly apparatus. It will aid the development of the argument through its clarity and make a serious attempt to develop independent thought. A piece of work at this level will be based on a Range of Knowledge that is extensive, even though it may be uneven. It will demonstrate an understanding of the complexity of the subject, and will show evidence of an ability to argue at both the general and particular level. In general, the work will meet the requirements of the assignment task and will approach them in a way that is creative and well argued. The level of ambition will be high, both in the student's approach to work set by a tutor and where a student is given scope for defining the topic. Where the work entails the collection and collation of data, the work will be handled with appropriate rigour and be well integrated into the argumentation. Where group work is involved, there will be evidence of full engagement in the work of the team.C (50-59) Good; satisfactory for Masters
Design work
The design is good. Where a student is given scope for defining the task then the work falls short of achieving those ambitions in the execution of the design, or, conversely the ambitions of the task are met, but they are relatively modest. The work may be competent but not be completely resolved in its design or presentation. There is evidence that the work could reach the B grade given more time and effort.Written work
The Structure will demonstrate some understanding of the question set but may show only moderate awareness of its wider implications. The piece of work will have a point of view but the arguments may be stated rather than developed and factual material, although relevant, may be used more descriptively than analytically. The Language and Expression will be sufficiently accurate and relevant to demonstrate a reasonable grasp of the topic but may lack fluency. The scholarly apparatus will be sufficient but may be incomplete or idiosyncratic. The argumentation may be derivative with little evidence of independent thought. The Range of Knowledge will be sound, although there may be some inaccuracies. It will have been assimilated uncritically and there may be a reliance on information and argumentation already presented in the lectures. In general, the work will meet most of the requirements of the assignment task. Where a student is given scope for defining the topic, it will present an appropriate degree of challenge for the level of the course. Where the work entails the collection and collation of data, this will be handled with appropriate rigour but may not be very well integrated with the argumentation. Where group work is involved, there will be evidence of involvement in the work of the team.D (40-49) Satisfactory for Diploma but inadequate for Masters
Design work
(i) The work is competent but not good, suggesting that it could not reach the B level without major re-working; or (ii) the work is not sufficiently complete in its design or presentation. In the case of (ii) there is evidence that the work could attain the C level with major re-development.Written work
The Structure may demonstrate little understanding of the question set and may tend to stray from the topic The argument may be undeveloped and haphazard and the factual material may be used descriptively rather than analytically. The Language and Expression will generally be grammatical but may lack fluency and sophistication. The scholarly apparatus may be deficient. There may be little evidence of an understanding of the complex nature of the inquiry and the answer may show no intentional originality of approach. The Range of Knowledge may be adequate but may contain errors. It will be broadly relevant to the question but may be used in a descriptive and uncritical way. In general, work will be competent but not good. Where a student is given scope for defining the topic, it will present a degree of challenge appropriate to the level of the course. Where the work entails the collection and collation of data, this will be handled with appropriate rigour, but may be poorly integrated with the argumentation. Where group work is involved, there may be some evidence of involvement in the work of the team.E (35-39) Marginal Fail
Design work
(i) The work may be insufficiently complete to assess its quality adequately or (ii) the work may be judged to be of poor quality whatever the level of completeness. In the case of (i) it would be expected that the work could be brought up to the D level with more time and effort.Written work
The Structure may be weak, showing little understanding of the question and no understanding of its wider implications. It may tend towards random presentation of facts and opinions. The Language and Expression may present a significant number of basic errors in spelling and grammar and may have deficiencies in the scholarly apparatus. It may fail to present any evidence of coherent, independent thought. The Range of Knowledge may be inadequate, with major errors, and of doubtful relevance to the question. In general, the work may be poor in most, if not all areas. It may also, or alternatively, be incomplete.F (25-34) Clear Fail
Design Work
The work is not of sufficient quality or at a level of completeness that it could be redeemed to a D without re-starting the project.Written work
The work may be seriously deficient in most, if not all areas. It may also, or alternatively, be incomplete.G/H (below 25) Bad Fail
The work, of whatever kind, is extremely poor, incomplete or absent. It is deficient in most or all significant respects.Degree Aims and Outcomes
- Develop specific knowledge and provide a broadly-based foundation for research into theories of culture and design in the context of digital media
- Develop understandings of digital technology’s complicity in reconfigurations of identity, spatiality, communication, the local and the global, and narratives of social and cultural transformation
- Encourage critical responses to developments in digital media
- Develop critiques of commentaries on digital media that appear in the academic and popular literature
- Examine critically the cultural and social contexts in which technological change takes place, through theories of urbanism, spatiality, globalization, non-place and cultural landscape
- Provide intellectual support for digital media design and art practice, installation design, composition, architecture and other practice-based applications
- Compare critically the relevance to digital media studies of theories drawn from phenomenology, analytical philosophy, positivism, romanticism, various schools of thought within philosophy, psychology, perception, aesthetics, ethics and language, critical theory, hermeneutics, deconstruction, post-colonial studies, semiotics, feminism, structuralism and poststructuralism
- Provide an analytical framework to enable students to develop scholarly and informed thinking in their chosen area of research
- Provide a foundation for advanced research
Assessment of research work
MSc and Diploma award requirements
Essay and report guidelines
References
- Russell, Terence M. 1992. Essays, Reports and Dissertations: Guidance Notes on the Preparation and Presentation of Written Work, Architecture, University of Edinburgh. [Available in the Architecture Library.]
- Strunk, William (1918). Elements of Style, Geneva, N.Y.: Press of W.P. Humphrey. [Available on line at http://www.bartleby.com/141/index.html .]
Late Penalties & Extensions
- Recent short-term physical illness or injury;
- Recent short-term mental ill-health;
- A long-term or chronic physical health condition, which has recently worsened temporarily or permanently;
- A long-term or chronic mental health condition, which has recently worsened temporarily or permanently;
- The recent bereavement or serious illness of a person with whom the student has a close relationship;
- The recent breakdown in a long-term relationship, such as a marriage;
- Emergencies involving dependents;
- Job or internship interview at short notice that requires significant time, e.g. due to travel;
- Victim of a crime which is likely to have significant emotional impact;
- Military conflict, natural disaster, or extreme weather conditions.
Teaching Quality Assurance
Feedback and return of marked submissions
For information on student feedback deadlines, please visit:http://www.ed.ac.uk/files/atoms/files/tar17-18.pdf (Regulation 15). Also see http://www.ed.ac.uk/files/atoms/files/2014_feedbackappealscomplaintspolicy_final.pdf and http://www.enhancingfeedback.ed.ac.uk. Key elements of this policy state that:
- All students will be given at least one formative feedback or feedforward event for every course they undertake, provided during the semester in which the course is taken and in time to be useful in the completion of summative work on the course. ...
- Feedback on formative assessed work will be provided within 15 working days of submission, or in time to be of use in subsequent assessments within the course, whichever is sooner. Summative marks will be returned on a published timetable, which has been made clear to students at the start of the academic year.
University Context
Staff
| Richard Coyne | Programme DirectorProfessor of Architectural Computing | Minto House, Chambers Street Extension 502332 |
| John Lee | Professor in Digital Media | Alison House, Nicolson SquareExtension 502335 HCRC: Informatics Forum, rm 4.28 Extension 504420 |
| Martin Parker | MSc specialist lecturer; Programme Director of MSc in Sound Design | Alison House Extension 502333 |
| Jules Rawlinson | Lecturer | Alison House Upper level, Atrium |
| Andrew Connor | Teaching Fellow | Alison House, Upper Level, Atrium |
| Denitsa Petrova | Teaching Fellow | Alison House, Upper Level, Atrium |
| Geoff Lee | Chief Computing Officer, ECA | Maltings 4.12 Extension 502341 |
| Ian Gunn | Computing Officer, ECA | Maltings 4.12 Extension 508020 |
| Mathieu Donner | MSc by Research Secretary, ECA Postgraduate Office Mathieu.Donner@ed.ac.uk | Evolution House, ECA Graduate School Extension 515740 |
| Rosalie Dobson | Art and Architecture Librarian | Art & Architecture Library Extension 502310 |
| Other staff may participate in specialised teaching and supervising as appropriate; it is impractical to list them here. | ||
Other costs
Research ethics, integrity and security
- ECA Ethics policy: http://www.eca.ed.ac.uk/eca-home/research/ethics-policy
- How to apply for ethical approval in ECA (via the ECA Intranet): https://uoe.sharepoint.com/sites/hss/eca/research-ke-impact/_layouts/15/start.aspx#/SitePages/Research%20Ethics.aspx
Health and safety
Other related documents
Complaints procedures
Teaching quality and assurance
Student representation and participation
Support services
- Surveys, Student Representation and Engagement
- The Student Contract
- Student Conduct
- Study Support
- My Profile
- My Supervisor
- Curriculum, Assessment and Appeals
- How to Make a Complaint
- Exams and Timetables
- Disability Support
- Technology and Libraries
- Activities
- Social Responsibility and Sustainability
- Accommodation
- Transport and Getting Around
- International Students
- Childcare
- Support for Study
- Student Counselling
- Disability Support
- Chaplaincy
- Sport and Exercise
- Health Services
- Your Wellbeing
- Job Portal
- What are my options?
- Work while you study
- Help with Applications
- Developing you Employability
- Volunteering
- International Opportunities
- Postgrad Lauchpad
- Tuition Fees
- Financial Assistance
- Money Problems and Debt Advice
- Bank Accounts
Official communications
Other Forms of Communication
Mobile phones are used in emergency situations and students are encouraged to update their contact details via the MyEd portal. At times we will write to you; it is important to keep both your semester and permanent home address up to date. This is also done via the MyEd portal. Updating Personal Details Via “Student Self Service”, students can view and edit personal and study details within their MyEd Portal. The Student Personal Details channel allows students to review their contact details, address information & emergency contacts. It also provides the ability to edit certain personal details directly: www.euclid.ed.ac.uk/student/Student_Self_Service.htmSocial Media Guidelines
Social media – tools such as blogs, Facebook, Twitter – can be a good way for you to share your thoughts and questions about the University, your programme and your courses. Many courses will have a social media space (e.g. a Facebook group), some may be set up and administered by course organisers, class reps, or others. While there are many cautionary tales about the use of social media, there are also many positives to engaging with it. There have been many examples recently of students and graduates using social media to network and, in some cases, find employment. Social media allows easy exchange of information and ideas and can provide a powerful platform for discussion - all of which is within the control of the account owner. Do not be afraid to engage with debate, but do remember that what goes on the internet stays on the internet – you need to remember that a future employer may discover things about you that you would prefer to keep private. We expect you to be courteous in your postings and not to make personal or hurtful comments about other students or staff. You should ensure your comments are lawful, i.e. are consistent with legislatively protected areas of equality and diversity, and do not constitute a disciplinary offence under the University’s code, which include offensive behaviour (in writing as well as actual) and bringing the University into disrepute. For further information on the use of Social Media, please see the University’s main website via the following link: http://www.ed.ac.uk/website-programme/training-support/guidelines/social-media To view the University of Edinburgh Social Media Handbook, please see the following link: http://www.docs.sasg.ed.ac.uk/AcademicServices/Discipline/StudentCodeofConduct.pdf
Additional Research Workshops (IAD)
The Institute for Academic Development (IAD) provides a number of workshops and resources for University of Edinburgh postgraduate research students, to help you gain the skills, knowledge, and confidence needed for studying at postgraduate level.
The workshops are free of charge to students and are organised by the IAD or in conjunction with the Schools and College. Workshops can be booked via MyEd or the IAD website.
Starting out-
The early stages of your Postgraduate Research are about finding your feet, working out what you want to achieve and making the best possible start to your postgraduate research. We recommend attending some of the following courses:
- Getting Started with your PhD (PhD only)
- PG Essentials (On-Line Learning Course)
- How to be an Effective Researcher (PhD only)
- Writing courses
- Effective Presentations
- Writing a Research Paper
- Time Management
- Managing your Research Project
- Relevant IT courses
- Thesis Workshops (PhD only)
- Careers Strategies for PhD Researchers (PhD only)
- The Edinburgh Local GRADschool (PhD only)
- Business Skills and Enterprise courses
